Wednesday, October 21, 2026
UNKILLABLE RUSSIAN USSR


Md.
Merajul Islam
Fully
Masterized, Department of Social Work, Rajshahi College, Bangladesh
Prof. Dr. Jacques
Coulardeau
Université Paris 1
Panthéon-Sorbonne, France
ANSWER PART 2
3. Suny: The Empire's
Corpse Is Still Drawing the Front Lines
The historian
Ronald Grigor Suny offers the least abstract and, in a strict sense, the most
falsifiable of the three answers, because it can be checked against a map and a
body count rather than a philosophical claim about cosmic energy or convergent
social grammars. In his 1990 assessment of the nationalities crisis then
tearing through the Caucasus, given as Soviet troops were entering Azerbaijan,
Suny observed that Soviet nationality policy had assigned ethnic groups to
fixed territories and ranked statuses
union republic, autonomous republic, autonomous oblast in a process the
affected populations were never consulted on, 'implemented quite arbitrarily',
producing new nations where none had existed and submerging others inside
larger ones; and that so long as the Soviet state itself endured, these
arbitrary designations caused no open war, because Moscow remained the sole
arbitrator of last resort for any dispute between them.[1] His
later, fuller study, The Revenge of the Past, generalised the point: the Soviet
system's national delimitation of the 1920s and 1930s did not merely misgovern
pre-existing nations, it manufactured a great many of the nations themselves,
then froze their mutual grievances in administrative amber for sixty years.[2]
Subsequent legal and political-science scholarship has confirmed the mechanism
in exact and grim detail: ethnic groups were placed in a strict constitutional
hierarchy, some deliberately split across republican borders to weaken their
capacity for self-advocacy, and the guarantee of whatever autonomy each group
held existed only for as long as the Soviet constitution itself existed.[3]
Nagorno-Karabakh, an Armenian-majority autonomous oblast administratively
lodged inside Soviet Azerbaijan; Abkhazia and South Ossetia, autonomous units
inside Soviet Georgia each was a Soviet cartographic decision, not a pre-Soviet
fact, and each has produced war, ethnic cleansing, or unresolved military
occupation in almost exact proportion to how firmly the Soviet state, and only
the Soviet state, had once guaranteed its particular status.[4] Here
the earlier legal-continuity argument about UN Security Council seats looks
almost decorative by comparison. Whatever else disappeared in 1991, the actual
administrative geography of Soviet ethnic engineering did not disappear; it
simply stopped being administered, and immediately began, on its own, to kill
people along precisely the lines Soviet cartographers had drawn six decades
earlier. If any single fact demonstrates that the USSR persists rather than
vanished, it is not a treaty or a scholarly paradox. It is a trench.

4. Civilizational Transformation, Beneath the Argument
About Ideology
What Gumilev,
Zinoviev, and Suny share, despite starting from biology, sociology, and
cartography respectively and despite two of them having been hounded by the
Soviet state they are sometimes mistaken for defending, is a refusal to treat
1991 as an event occurring inside political history at all. Gumilev's timescale
is too long for 1991 to be anything but a single incident in a centuries-long
organism's life. Zinoviev's claim is that the categories 'Soviet' and 'Western'
were already dissolving into each other beneath the ideological surface, so
that no clean victory was available to either side to claim. And Suny's map
shows that the most durable thing the Soviet Union produced was not an ideology
or an economy at all, but a set of physical, cartographic facts that continue
to generate violence with no ideological content whatsoever. Armenians and
Azerbaijanis do not fight over Nagorno-Karabakh because one side is Marxist and
the other liberal. Each of the three, in other words, locates the real Soviet
Union somewhere underneath the place where the 1991 argument is usually held,
in a layer that the collapse of an ideology does not reach: a biological
rhythm, a shared administrative grammar, or a line on a map. Civilizations, on
all three accounts, are not dismantled by the fall of the flag that happened to
be flying over them. They are inherited, mile by mile and generation by
generation, by whatever structure biological, managerial, or cartographic was
actually doing the work the flag took credit for.
5. Conclusion
So: has the
Soviet Union disappeared, or has it become something different? At the depth
Gumilev, Zinoviev, and Suny were each independently working, none of them in
dialogue with the other two, none of them trying to answer a Western question
on Western terms, the answer is not merely that it transformed, but that '1991'
was never the right unit to ask the question about in the first place. A civilization
measured in the centuries Gumilev used does not register a seventy-year
ideological experiment as anything more than a single turbulent phase in its
own much longer aging. A social order measured, as Zinoviev insisted on
measuring it, by its actual administrative and informational grammar rather
than its declared ideology, had already begun merging with its supposed
opposite well before the Soviet flag came down, which means there was no clean
'other side' left to defect to. And a territory measured, as Suny measured it,
by the literal borders a vanished bureaucracy once drew, is still in
Nagorno-Karabakh, in Abkhazia, in South Ossetia, enforcing those borders with
artillery, decades after the ministry that drew them closed its doors. None of
this is a story about who won the Cold War. It is a story about how much of any
civilization was never actually carried by its ideology to begin with, and how
little, therefore, that ideology's disappearance actually explains.
… TILL NEXT TOPIC …
The
Incas, they say …
Bibliography
Geukjian, Ohannes. Ethnicity, Nationalism and Conflict
in the South Caucasus: Nagorno-Karabakh and the Legacy of Soviet Nationalities
Policy. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012.
Gumilev, Lev. Ethnogenesis and the Biosphere of the
Earth. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1990 (Russian original completed in stages,
1939–1979).
Harzl, Benedikt C. 'The Soviet Nationalities Policies
and Their Contribution to Conflicts: Law, Legacies and Ideology.' International
Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 14, no. 1 (2019).
Suny, Ronald Grigor. The Revenge of the Past:
Nationalism, Revolution, and the Collapse of the Soviet Union. Stanford:
Stanford University Press, 1993.
Titov, Alexander Sergeevich. Lev Gumilev, Ethnogenesis
and Eurasianism. PhD thesis, University College London, 2005.
Zinoviev, Alexander. Homo Sovieticus. London: Victor
Gollancz, 1985 (Russian original 1982).
Zinoviev, Alexander. Katastroika: Legend and Reality
of Gorbachevism. London: Claridge Press, 1990.
Online sources consulted: New World Encyclopedia, 'Lev
Gumilev' and 'Alexander Zinoviev'; ResearchGate, 'Lev Gumilev: His Pretensions
as Founder of Ethnology and his Eurasian Theories'; Institute of Modern Russia,
'The ‘Enlightened Nationalism’ of Lev Gumilev'; dokumen.pub (Titov thesis);
Philosophy Now, Issue 26; marxists.org, 'The Crisis in the Caucasus' (Against
the Current, 1990); Texas Digital Library, 'Blurred Lines' (all accessed 2026).
Jacques Coulardeau uploaded a paper
https://www.academia.edu/144641680/LAUNCHING_PAD_RAMPE_DE_LANCEMENT_FOR_RESEARCH_BEGINNERS
Mohammad Merajul Islam, now he is fully Masterized,
will imprint a mark on historical science, both as a researcher and as a
Muslim. We have to support the "Renaissance" of Islam in a universe
of cosmic hostility. It
can open us to the
phylogenetic continuity in history. FROM
getting passé TO déjà vu AND FINALLY TO TRANS-SUBSTANTIATION.
By Jacques
Coulardeau & Md. Merajul
ISLAM
35 Pages
2025, Éditions La
Dondaine, Medium.com
Check Mohammad’s latest eBook
The Architecture of Silence: Language,
Migration, and the Survival of Suppressed Civilizations
by Mohammad
Merajul ISLAM (Author), Jacques
COULARDEAU (Author)
Format: Kindle
Edition
Kindle Book Amazon ASIN: B0GY92ZTK1
Publisher: Éditions La Dondaine
Publication
date: April 27, 2026
Language: English
Print length: 385 pages

[1]Ronald Grigor Suny,
interviewed by Susan Weissman, 'The Crisis in the Caucasus', Against the
Current, no. 26 (May/June 1990): 'Whatever its initial intentions... it was
implemented quite arbitrarily. These people obviously weren't consulted; some
new nations were created quite artificially... Once Gorbachev opened the lid on
this Pandora's box of the national question, he was confronted with all of
these latent conflicts';
https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/atc/8482.html.
[2]Ronald Grigor Suny,
The Revenge of the Past: Nationalism, Revolution, and the Collapse of the
Soviet Union (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993).
[3]Benedikt C. Harzl,
'The Soviet Nationalities Policies and Their Contribution to Conflicts: Law,
Legacies and Ideology', International Journal of Foresight and Innovation
Policy 14, no. 1 (2019), arguing that the installation of proto-elements of
statehood within Soviet ethnic federalism created the structural conditions for
the conflicts that followed 1989 across the union's internal borders.
[4]On the specific
mechanism in the South Caucasus ethnic groups placed in a strict hierarchy of
union republic, autonomous republic, and autonomous oblast, with some groups
divided across borders to weaken their political standing, and Moscow left as
sole guarantor of any resulting dispute see 'Blurred Lines: Effects of the
Soviet Nationality Policy on Ethnic Conflicts in the South Caucasus',
https://tdl-ir.tdl.org/items/5de1fd6d-29de-4d0c-9fe6-bffbb9cf38be; and Ohannes
Geukjian, Ethnicity, Nationalism and Conflict in the South Caucasus:
Nagorno-Karabakh and the Legacy of Soviet Nationalities Policy (Farnham:
Ashgate, 2012).

