Tuesday, June 30, 2026
AI & LLMs lead to Digital Colonialism
AI
and Multilingualism Q5: The One Misconception This Book Most Urgently Corrects
Jacques Coulardeau & Md. Merajul Islam
2026 • Éditions La Dondaine, Medium.com
SILENCE ON THE RANKS AND IN THE LABS!
Despite all that has been said on the positive
dimension of silence, meaning outside silence, silence around you, people still
consider silence in history, silence in anthropology, and silence in
archaeology, as meaning the absence of what we may or might be looking for.
Let me and us be clear: Silence is the absence of
any noise to our ears! But that does not mean there is nothing to be found
if we should try to look for something. That reminds me of an episode in the
Dentistry Ward of Hospital Val de Grâce in Paris, a military hospital. It was
in 1968. All dentistry students who had finished their basic years of study
opted to serve their military service in a military hospital, which was
practice for their future professions.
I was complaining about a toothache. The dentistry graduate
who was looking after me made a first X-ray image of the tooth and saw nothing.
So, he did what he had been told to do. He adjusted the X-ray apparatus and
made a second X-ray picture. On this one, there was a cyst at the tip of the
root of the tooth. With these contradictory pictures, he asked his fellow
dentist graduate next to him: “Which picture is the proper picture?” His fellow
graduate told him: “A picture can always see nothing, but if a picture sees
something, it does not hallucinate. So, you should proceed with the cyst.”
Today we know an AI machine can hallucinate. But in
July or August 1968, there was no AI machine. X-ray machines did not
hallucinate, though they could be blind.
But in our field of cultural and spiritual
archaeology, anthropology, and even theology and spirituality, when using AI
machines, agentive or not, generative or not, we must keep in mind that
“nothing” does not prove there is nothing, and it can hallucinate something
where there is nothing at all, and it is better to double up the test, the
procedure.
AI applied to the 7,500 languages in the world is on
the point of committing a mass murder of languages, a nearly complete genocide
of languages. AI means LLM. LLM means 3 trillion data points. Only 6 to 12
languages can have such an LLM. All other 5,488 languages will have to accept being
translated into one of the happy few LLMs by a machine trained for its own and
only happy language selected by the masters of the world, hence translating the
unhappy language into a happy few language is treacherous, distortive, unfair,
and the original unhappy language <will end up dead, absent, except if
1- The world decides to compensate for this loss …
2- … Compensate by teaching the languages and cultures
concerned to those who are their natural audience, the natives of these
languages.
3- Develop libraries for these languages, working on
all possible conservational media.
4- AND OF COURSE A BUDGET THAT HAS TO BE PAID BY THE
TECHNOLOGY THAT CREATES THE HAZARD;
Have a good read.
Academia.edu Comment
Jacques Coulardeau & Md. Merajul Islam
To avoid the Butlerian Jihad will be
difficult, but we will have to work hard and fast over the less than ten next
years. If Europe wants to do something to avoid being colonized by American AI,
it will have to take into account the 7,488 languages that are planned to
disappear or become silent by American AI corporations and the US government.
Working on prompts will not be enough. The Europeans should start working on a
Multilingual, Multidialectal Large Language Model to save the 7,488 languages
programmed to become silent.
Artificial
Intelligence, * Linguistic
Genocide, * E-Colonialism/Digital
Colonialism, * Generative
AI,
* LLMs





