Friday, September 03, 2021
It takes a Kaku to misunderstand Thomas Aquinas
Fiery Kaku vs. Thomas Aquinas
https://jacquescoulardeau.medium.com/fiery-kaku-vs-thomas-aquinas-23dffce974c9
Physics
and theology have so little in common that it is surprising Michio Kaku just
dares to mix them in a hot cocktail that may burn the tail of any dragon on
this planet. His heart thus oscillates between Thomas Aquinas and Black Holes
with Wormholes in-between. That's holy physics I guess or fear.
All
that Michio Kaku says about physics is quite well-informed. After all, he is a
physicist. The question we have in the front section of our mind all the time
is “Why does Michio Kaku look for the God Equation.? What does God have to do
with physics? The answer only comes late in chapter seven, page 189: “I am an
agnostic.” What is an agnostic? It is not an atheist. An atheist negates the
existence of God, and thus by this negation gives that God some consistency
since you do not negate something that does not exist. You do not need to do
that. You do not need to negate the existence of lunar satellites, because
there is none. An agnostic does not negate the existence of God but considers
it has no importance at all for him or her.
2021, Medium.com
