34-
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE – HENRY VI PART TWO – BBC – 1983
Welcome back to the flotsam
setting and now in England
time is hot, times are hard, history is more or less getting blocked and
hijacked into a civil war after the loss of France. The king, now married, is
just as spineless as before and his wife is trying to govern in his place. She
cannot get anything from him and her manipulating the nobles around him reveals
itself more complicated than she may have thought at first. She gets rid of the
Lord Protector but that starts a tremendous uproar and everyone tries to get
everyone else’s head, and there are many heads to get.
He tries to get rid of
Richard of York by sending him to Ireland with some troops but that was a
pretty bad move because York comes back from Ireland with his troops to get the
crown since by simple precedence in the lineage to the throne he is the first
heir, which means Henry VI is a usurper, which is absolutely true: Henry IV (a
Lancaster) forced Richard II (a York) to give him the crown under duress of
course.
Add to that the popular
rebellion of Jack Cade presented as a rebellion of the Commons from Kent and in
fact it is a popular upheaval, not only the Commons but a lot more people. It
was in 1450 when France
was well lost. No hope on that front. The rebellion is crushed when they
reached London. The play gives a lot of life and credit to
Jack Cade but it also shows how easy his populace can be manipulated, by him
first with the promise of the repealing of money and food and drinks free for
everyone. Nothing really has changed and people are so gullible and they believe
such blank promises.
York
starts his own rebellion and manages to meet the king in the royal camp between
Dartford and Blackheath. The king is revealed
untrustworthy since he has announced Buckingham is in the Tower and at this
very moment there Buckingham arrives accompanied by the queen. From there we
have a long battle, to and fro in the derelict décor and they kill one another
in the most manly way. York
is wounded but nothing serious and his main opponents are dead, particularly
Clifford Senior killed by York himself. The end is sad since the King has
managed to flee with the queen and whoever he could take along to London where he discovers
the damage of Jack Cade’s rebellion. And there the action stops. To be
continued. York and his men are going to London
to confront the king.
What can we say on such
a play? Not much actually. The fight around the crown made England weak and they lost France completely after a short
period of success with Henry V but only nine years. Henry VI being himself weak
and unable to really establish any authority the strife for the crown gets very
severe. Since the Lancaster
have had the crown by an irregular way that did not respect the order of
precedence to get on the throne, the legitimacy of Henry VI is not acceptable. York has one degree of
precedence over Henry VI.
The War of the Roses is
probably one of the events in England
that created a national feeling to replace the feudal system of vassalage. A new actor comes into the picture and it is
the Commons, that is to say the second house of parliament, the normally
elected representatives of free people, mostly landowners, craftsmen and
shopkeepers or merchants. This is typical of England and Shakespeare did not
miss the point. But this new actor on the political scene is nothing but a
rebellion and it is purely defeated by force and then a royal pardon. The
leader is killed by some local civilian in London.
But you have the main
idea Shakespeare defends everywhere: when something wrong disturbs the regular
order of things then it has to be purged to the very last drop. That means the
two conflicting houses will have to drain their claims to give way to another
actor coming from the side and it will be the Tudors. They will come to power
after the defeat or Richard III in 1485 and the new king will be Henry VII.
There is something
typically Shakespearean at the end of the play. The menace to the House of
Lancaster or the “ghost” menacing it is Richard of York junior, the future
Richard III. Shakespeare uses some numerical symbolism to characterize some
situations or characters. Richard III is definitely 9 and his defeat is in 1485
which amounts to 1+8=9, 4+5=9, 1+4+8+5=18=9x2. This young Richard says at the
end of this play:
“RICHARD: My noble
father,
Three times today I holp
him to his horse,
Three times bestrid him,
thrice I led him off,
Persuaded him from any
further act.” (Act V, Scene iii)
He is speaking of Salisbury, a supporter of York. And at this very moment when Richard
had accumulate his NINE times, there comes Salisbury and he thanks Richard and says
speaking of God:
“SALISBURY:
I thank you Richard:
. . . And it hath
pleas’d him three times today
You have defended me
from imminent death.” (Act V, Scene iii)
Of course Salisbury goes back to
three because God is one in three, at the same time in Shakespeare three has a
special value. It is the triple goddess who includes Hecate the goddess of the
underworld, it is the three weird sisters of Macbeth and of course the three
Harpies or Erinyes, the goddesses of our
life time (they spin, measure, cut the thread of our life) and in general three
is dynamic, hence unstable, hence a sign of trouble. It is interesting to see
how the first time Richard appears he carries in his language the number 9, his
devilish fate.
In this play there is an
episode of witchcraft that brings the banishment of Eleanor of Gloucester, the
disgrace of her husband Humphrey, Duke of Gloucester, his subsequent death
(certainly by assassination), the burning of the witch herself and the
execution of some secondary characters except the intermediary who had
introduced Eleanor of Gloucester to the ritual since he was a double agent and had
revealed the event before to one side around the king who wanted to get rid of
the Duke of Gloucester who was then the Lord Protector.
But I must say the play
lacks some real unity and density.
Dr Jacques COULARDEAU
# posted by Dr. Jacques COULARDEAU @ 5:15 AM