Sunday, November 27, 2016


Encrypted Biblilcal symbolism


It is one of the best known and most produced play by Shakespeare and certainly the best known and most produced history. What’s surprising about this play is that it can stand all by itself though knowing the three Henry the Sixth plays help understand the stake of this one. True enough it only helps because this history is very self sufficient, in a way.

We have to clear the plate of a question that is today no longer debated. Shakespeare proposes here the vision of Richard III promoted by the Tudors, that is to say those who vanquished and destroyed him, in order to stabilize and justify their taking over te throne of England. Richard III was not the physical monster they described.

Richard III was no 'bunch-backed toad', research suggests
Paper published in Lancet says king's scoliosis probably caused him to be shorter but did not cause major physical deformity...
Severe scoliosis in the skeleton found under a Leicester car park less than two years ago – and DNA matches with a distant relative of the Plantagenet king – helped to confirm "beyond reasonable doubt" the identity of the remains.
... Research funded by Leicester University and published in the Lancet medical journal on Friday suggests the king's disfigurement was probably slight because a "well-balanced" sideways curvature in the spine would have meant his head and neck were straight, not tilted to one side.
Although the king's torso would have been short relative to the length of his arms and legs, and his right shoulder a little higher than his left, a good tailor and custom-made armour could have minimised the "visual impact" of his condition, according to the paper.
There was no evidence that Richard would have walked with an obvious limp; his leg bones were symmetric and well-formed. Neither would the disease, which probably developed when Richard was an adolescent, have reduced his ability to exercise.
The researchers have already established that Richard would have been about 5ft 8in (1.7m) tall without his scoliosis, about average for a medieval man, although his condition meant he would have appeared several inches shorter. Tudor propagandists, especially Shakespeare, ensured Richard has been seen as hunchbacked for centuries...
Phil Stone, chairman of the Richard III Society, which helped fund the dig which found the king's remains, said the research confirmed "the Shakespearean description of a 'bunch-backed toad' is a complete fabrication"... (, accessed November 27, 2016)

This being said this play is a real thriller. Richard has to eliminate everyone on his path to climb (really climb) to the throne. I would say that sounds plain normal but he declares himself to be evil and to enjoy killing, particularly innocent people. And when he has finally finished the elimination of those who have a blood claim to the throne, except Richmond who has fled to Brittany, he starts killing those who have helped him in his ascent, which is politically absurd and plain suicidal. Henry Tudor, Earl of Richmond, comes back with an army and defeats Richard III at Bosworth in 1485 and thus becomes Henry VII known as the first Tudor king, though he is a Lancaster, which means the House of Lancaster in the end wins but they change the dynastic reference, probably to ensure the past be the past, which might explain why Richard III after proper examination was buried in a small church with no indication on his grave, which explains why in modern times when the church was pull down to open some space for a parking lot no archaeological search was started and Richard III remained under the parking lot for a long time before new excavations to build some new structure finally discovered him, or at least his remains.

The victor is always right and history hates the past and disguises it to the colors of the present, which means the color of the past changes from one present to the next. In this case Shakespeare took part in the disguising campaign some 110 years after the events. Richard III only lived 33 years and reigned two. He had no descent but the House of York had of course and represented the Plantagenet line, though the Lancaster are also connected to the Plantagenet since Henry the Seventh’s great-great-great-grandfather was the Plantagenet king Edward III (1307-1327). Once again we have to keep in mind that the British kings, and it is probably true of many other noble families in the Middle Ages, were severely inbreeding in medieval times. And when they were not inbreeding in England they went on inbreeding with the French side of the family. They were all cousins and at times not that far removed.

That means the claim that could arise from the York branch of the Plantagenet blood line could have been strong enough to be considered as a real threat. When you want to kill your dog you just pretend he is rabid. And that’s what they did with Richard III.

This production is superb in many ways, once again by the physical acting of pain, sorrow and death, particularly with body language, facial language and tonal language. A triplet of queens is essential: Margaret the old widow of Henry the Sixth; Lady Anne, widow to Edward Prince of Wales, son of Henry the Sixth, later married to the Duke of Gloster who later became Richard the Third; and Elizabeth, queen to Edward the Fourth and then his widow. Of these three queens Lady Anne is the most discreet though fundamental because of her marrying Gloster, the future Richard the Third and the killer of both her husband and her father in law, but another triplet is composed with the Duchess of York, mother to King Edward the Fourth, Clarence and Gloster, the latter to become Richard the Third. The oldest of them, Margaret is a real warmonger against Richard the Third and this production makes her triumphant at the very end, after the concluding words from Henry the Seventh, sitting, laughing hysterically, at the top of a pile of half denuded dead bodies, and holding the corpse of Richard the Third. The full and final step of this purification cycle typical of Shakespeare: she takes, or rather is granted, the victory she is provided with by history or fate.

There is at least one happy person in that play, and it is Margaret, though true enough it is added to Shakespeare’s play that ends with a full pardon

RICHMOND: Now civil wounds are stopp’d, peace lives again:
That she may long live here, God say Amen!” (Act V, Scene v)

But to show how strong Shakespeare’s music can be, I will make a final remark on the famous ghost scene. In his last night living on earth before the battle of Bosworth he has a dream that brings up EIGHT apparitions of ghosts, eleven ghosts all together:
1- Prince Edward, son to Henry the Sixth;
2- King Henry the Sixth;
3- Clarence;
4- Rivers, Grey and Vaughan;
5- Hastings;
6- the two young princes, sons of Edward the Fourth;
7- Queen Anne (Princess of Wales, then Duchess of Gloster, then Queen to Richard the Third. DShe dies mysteriously before Bosworth, hence her apparition as a ghost);
8- Buckingham.

EIGHT is the symbol of the Second Coming, and here we have eleven second comings. The Second Coming is the triggering event of the Apocalypse in the Book of Revelation.

ELEVEN is the number of apostles after the elimination of Judas, the eleven apostles who retire away from the Crucifixion (except John) and who deny Jesus, like Peter, and who hide away from the crucifixion and post crucifixion scene out of fear. These eleven apostles announce the resurrection too, even if in a negative way, the way they announce the end of Richard III but they also appear to Richmond and they announce the resurrection of the English monarchy with Henry the Seventh, known as Richmond in this play.

Finally NINE is necessary to complete the prophecy, the prediction, by identifying the beast, in this case Richard the Third. And sure enough the ghosts are going to curse Richard III with a simple formula: “despair and die.” And in that ghost scene this mantra is repeated NINE times.

1- Prince Edward, son to Henry the Sixth: “despair, therefore, and die”;
2 & 3- King Henry the Sixth: “despair and die” “despair and die”;
4- Clarence: “despair and die”;
5 & 6- Rivers, Grey and Vaughan: “despair and die” “despair and die”;
7- Hastings: “despair and die”;
8- the two young princes, sons of Edward IV: “despair and die”;
9- Queen Anne: “despair and die”;
Ø- Buckingham: Ø.

We must understand that in Elizabethan times, after the Reformation and in the ascending phase of chapels and Puritanism, such biblical references (in this case the Passion of Jesus and the Book of Revelation) were unavoidable elements that everyone understood and appreciated. What’s more it is very effective in the “propaganda” (rather self-justification) of the Tudors: the killing of the crucifixion is prophesied, the Second Coming is announced and the Beast is identified. We are in the midst of medieval numerical symbolism. This makes me say NINE is the numerical symbol of this king, and as I have already said in my review of Henry the Sixth, Part Three: 1 + 8 = 9; 4 + 5 = 9; 1 + 4 + 8 + 5 = 18 = 9 x 2. The beast is killed on the diabolical date that is also the resurrection date of Bosworth, the final battle. After this last battle the prophecy of the New Messianic Jerusalem becomes possible.

That powerful symbolism runs through the whole play and had been announced at the end of the previous history. Going to the Globe Theater was a treat for the people of London and they went there regularly to enjoy the theater and to learn about their past history. Here the grossest goriest taste of the audience is satisfied along with the numerical symbolism that cannot be “cabalistic” since it is not Jewish, but is in a way metaphysical and even alchemical, though definitely Biblical, in this medieval and post medieval time, and the extra “knowledge” it provides on English history. Shakespeare’s theater was pedagogical, entertaining and slightly though at times enormously mysterious or poetic.


Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?