SPOTLIGHT – 2015
I will try to be short because
the subject of this film is so important, so dramatic, so horrific that we do
not need many words to speak of it.
My first remark is that it
concerns Catholic priests in the area of Boston, but it could – and probably
does – concern the whole world, and not only the Catholic church, and not only
churches or teachers and schools; or UN troops in the Central African Republic.
It is all the more shocking when it deals with an ethical institution like a
church or a peace-keeping corps of the United Nations or an educational
institution because these three institutions have an ethical definition and the
respect of the integrity of children is one basic principle of these
institutions. You could add the medical institution with orphanages,
psychiatric wards or hospitals, retirement homes (because sexual abuse MUST NOT
be only considered when the victims are children), etc. Sexual abuse, of
children particularly but not only, is a crime against humanity.
My second remark is that in any
society at large, in any social group in particular some abuses are often
hidden under the carpet and even at times tolerated not to stain the reputation
or the identity of this society or these social groups. There is in all social
community an identity dimension for the members and they may feel negated in
this identity of theirs if the public image of the community were criticized in
a way or another. Such criticism leads in certain cases to racism, segregation,
discrimination and of course exploitation, rejection and victimization. Better
keep the “small” defects secret so that it would not leak out in the public
around. And the members become silent, blind, deaf, and a few other sensual
impairments. And the family is such a
social community.
The third remark is very well
explained in the film by some victims. Children, often, but not only, from
disrupted families with marital violence, with parental violence, with poverty
and even divorce, if not divorces, and casual male or female partners going
through the home, not mentioning drugs, alcoholism and a few other
intoxications, children, boys as well as girls, in such situations from 6 to
14, at times later, look for some parental model, be it a man or a woman, a
substitute father or mother. When they have some adults who are close and as
such have a high level of prestige, a priest, a teacher, a coach, or at times
simple neighbors or even relatives, they can fall into the trap of sexual
attraction or sexual abuse. But even if sexual attraction there is, in the
child the experience of abuse, the sexual experience with an adult, will be
traumatic and will leave serious damage behind at the mental, psychological or
ethical levels.
The film did not try to explore
what the strategies of children in such situations are or can be. Some are
protective and enable the children to suffer the abuse as it it were something
from another world than their own, the one they build in their psyche. Note
this is very difficult when the abuser is a priest, a teacher, a father, a
brother, a mother, a sister, that is to say people who are essential for the
growth, development and maturation of the children. The film was in fact too
short on one issue. They insisted on the number of surviving victims (without
specifying the mode of this survival). But what about those that did not
survive? How many, how bad they ended, at what age, etc.?
The film is essential to show a vast problem but the
concentration onto only the victims of Catholic priests may appear as a way to
avoid speaking of pedophilia in our countries, and in the world. There might
not be 6% of pedophiles in our societies, male or female, but it is
indispensible to understand our modern rejection of pedophilia is a very recent
evolution in the West, that is to say mostly among Western Christians and Jews.
It sure is a crime against humanity but this is recent. Marriage was set at the
age of 13 for girls in England
by a law in Parliament in the 18th century. We would not even think
of it today, though some studies do say a fair proportion (40%?) of people
between 14 and 16 have had or regularly have some sexual activity. Nothing is
said before 14, except in doctors’ offices. It would be fair to consider that
sexual activities between young people at the early age of 14 leading quite
often to teenage pregnancies are also a form of pedophilia. That is to say
there is quite a long road ahead if we want to get rid of sexual activities
among minors. Is it abuse? Not all the time, but quite often yes, with some
drug use, some alcohol and just some carelessness. I would suggest to read my
own poetical fiction on the subject: “AN UNTELLABLE STORY, A dramatic Confession, THE NINETEEN STATIONS OF SARAPHIC
LOVE,” Kindle B00UP4CX88.
A fascinating film that has to be
widened in scope not to appear like a pamphlet against the Catholic Church that
neither deserves it nor is able to avoid the “problem” because it is simply the
predator nature of any man or woman that actually comes out in any situation
and may come out in any person when circumstances permit, like UN peace keeping
soldiers of French citizenship in the Central African Republic.
# posted by Dr. Jacques COULARDEAU @ 4:35 PM