ANTHONY HOPKINS – NICOLE KIDMAN – THE HUMAN STAIN – 2003
This is not a small little tiny
film to spend a Saturday evening in peace and quite with no mental work at all.
This film deserves a lot of attention. It speaks of crucial existential questions.
First of all, the racial identity
of a person. A man who is lily white in a black family, of course mother,
father, brother and sister are all mixed-bloods, all with different shades of
grey, but he is white and he does not want to be the victim of any racial
prejudice. So he pretends he is white and to more or less cover all fields,
terrains and domains he decides to make himself Jewish. As a Jew he can go
through society being slightly special, different, awkward about the racial
divide without being accused of being black.
Till one day when he is accused
of being a racist because he wondered in his class if a couple of students who
had never attended one single session were “spooks.” Unluckily, though unknown
of him, the said students were black and they signed a complaint against the
professor accusing him of being a racist, and he was fired because of course he
kept it perfectly secret that he himself was black. In fact if he had told
these narrow-minded bureaucrats in his college he was black and had been hiding
that fact for more than fifty years, he would have been accused of being a
racist at the higher second level, at the level where you try to evade your own
racial origin.
But this crisis late in his life
brings his wife down, who had never known he was black. She just dies because
the stress of this situation gets to her heart. Then he is alone and that’s how
he gets in touch with a writer he had taught and who was not too far away,
living like a recluse in some cabin in the mountains. He wants that writer to
write the story of his life. The point is that the writer does not really want
to do it but the younger recluse writer and the older fired professor fall in
friendship, in fact they fall in love, the strange love between an older man
and a younger man, a mental and spiritual love that gives some energy back to
the older man who starts a new life late in his existence, and that gives some
new motivation to the younger writer who finds a new inspiration for a further
volume in his creative writing experience. Just exploring this friendship would
be a great dimension for this film. And it sure is.
But this film goes one step
further and the older man meets a younger woman who is attracted by older men
because at the age of fourteen she got into some “accident” with some step
father or who cares whom, and she hit the road. The older man, thanks to
Viagra, and we are told about the blue pill quite a few times, though it is
absolutely not important, falls in love with this woman and this time heftily
at the sexual level of love, if sex is part of love. There is nothing that can
in anyway fit in on one hand that older intellectual who has run away from his
racial origin and his ethnic identity, and on the other hand this younger woman
who is running away from an older husband who is absolutely dangerous because
he is psychologically at least unstable if not frankly berserk, delirious,
insane and murderous. And yet love there is though both, the older intellectual
man and the younger hardly educated woman, will be caused to die in a road
accident by the ex-husband one night on a frozen road in the mountains. A
perfect crime because no one found anything linking his truck to the car that
jumped into a frozen lake and went through the ice.
This should lead many people to
wondering what love, sexual or not, between an older person and a younger
person, I mean with at least a thirty year difference, can mean, can be. No one
but the concerned people can answer that question: it is an exhilarating and
unique experience that only concerns a few people. Most of the time grandfathers/mothers
and mothers/fathers experience that kind of love with their grandchildren or
their own children. But some come cross this experience in life. Most of the
time, around such couples (sexual or not, that is not the point), people will
say that the older person is just living in phantasms and fantasies while the
younger person is taking advantage of the older man. It may be so now and then,
but it is not always so.
The film shows one element that
is crucial. Such an encounter will bring the older person to opening the
drawers of his/her long ago life and bring into light traumas that had been
kept secret, hidden away, and unluckily must I say, this older person will be
accused of imagining things and being delusional, except by his/her partner in
this relation. I personally think that an older person who has kept some
“secret” deep in his/her memory hidden away from the world around is actually
looking for another person who could help him/her open the box, recapture the
past, bring it out of the shadow in which it had been locked and imprisoned for
at times forty or fifty years. The younger person is the intercessor, the
go-between and enables the older person to cope with the suffering that has to
come along with this re-discovery. That film is a marvelous exploration of that
cruel and painful past of the older lily-white black person who has covered his
track by declaring himself Jewish.
Just enjoy this film and take a
walk on memory lane and check if deep in your unconscious mind and memory there
is not something that should be brought back up. If you can’t do it by yourself
look for the one who is going to be your catalyzer and share what you find with
that other person. It will produce some unimaginable friendship or love and
sharing that past will be one thousand times more pleasurable than plain sex
that is so often mixed up with love, although it is nothing but the cherry on
top of the pastry, the star at the top of the Christmas tree, the wrapping of
some birthday present, the frosting of any homemade cake.
What can we do if some people are
obsessed by taking the cherry, caressing the star, disrobing the present or
licking their fingers clean after dipping them in the frosting? Don’t forget
you can always know an elephant has been in your fridge when you see the
footprints it left in the butter.
Dr Jacques COULARDEAU
1 October 2010
|
When racism becomes a crime against oneself
|
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
This film is more than
disquieting; It is disturbing. An older senior professor is fired (he resigns
but that is the same) when confronted to some accusation of misconduct because
he asked one day if two students he was trying to question and who had never
come to his class were spooks. The two students were black, which he could not
know. At the beginning we see a car accident and we will see the same scene at
the end and we will know who were in the car and we will have to guess what
happened. In the meantime we find out that this older man falls in love with a
younger woman, twice younger than he is, in her early thirties. That love
affair does not work properly and yet it is an unbreakable love affair. But the
woman is divorced, slightly unstable and her ex-husband is completely berserk
and he is suffering of the trauma of Vietnam veterans who cannot get
over the obsessive compulsive disorder of theirs that make them do strange
things without any reason or conscience. Those are for sure spooks and they may
spook the hell out of you. Since he was present on the final death scene, we
can imagine the reaction of the ex-professor when he saw the red truck on the
deep snow on the road in the mountains. But that's the easy way. Shortly after
his being fired and his wife dying of a heart attack in his arms because of it
he goes and meets an author who has completely retired in the mountain and they
both fall not in love but in complete friendship.
We have then two cases of an
old man in love with a younger woman and in friendship with a younger man. I
think the second case is dealt with more realism. Such a friendship is direct,
often brutal in tone and content but absolute in trust and unbreakable. Such a
friendship is like a buoy for a drowning old man and a tremendous discovery for
the younger man if he is curious and accepts the bond, because it is a bond. Of
course there is no erotic dimension to that. The two become soul brothers and
enjoy every moment and every hard word of this experience because it is their
deepest soul and mind that are in love and this love or friendship becomes for
both a kind of life line with the infinite. It is different with the woman
because it is sexual and you do not need to be a great lawyer to fear some
pregnancy problem or some fatherhood questioning eventually. The love between
the two is not depicted with any tenderness. It is rather violent and rather
uniquely centered on love thanks to Viagra.
All that is the surface of the
problem depicted on, the film. Some flashbacks reveal little by little that
this professor who is known as white and Jewish is of a quite different origin
and that is the very and deepest meaning of the "spook" remark. It is
deeply racist but racist against himself and his choice to become a Jew is
another sign of his racism by affiliating himself to a minority group that is
hated by so many people in the world so that he will be hated by many. And then
we can see the final death scene again and we can wonder if it is not a
suicide. We can wonder or be sure, depending on the level of consciousness we
have that racism is a stain deep in the mind, the soul and the spirit of a man,
a stain he can only get rid of by killing himself, and in that case along with
the younger woman he is supposed to love and is asleep next to him, as if he
were afraid to go away alone. It is true when you lose the first girl you love
because you take her to your family and she discovers they are not as white as
she is and as her boyfriend, their son, is, there is like a long simmering
desire to kill, at least to kill oneself because of this injustice, unfairness.
Dr Jacques
COULARDEAU, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, University Paris 8 Saint
Denis, University Paris 12 Créteil, CEGID
# posted by Dr. Jacques COULARDEAU @ 1:50 PM