JOSEPH GIBALDI – MLA HANDBOOK FOR WRITERS OF RESEARCH PAPERS
– SIXTH EDITION - 2003
This is a utilitarian book and it
is supposed to contain everything on the subject. You are advised though to
compare with what is available in your particular field of research. There are
many particularities that are also ideologically or politically motivated and
cannot be taken into account in this extremely comprehensive book.
For example: dating the past. It
is obvious from any logical point of view that dating is feasible if a starting
point is clearly defined. Unluckily archaeologists have decided to take the
carbon readings as the proper way to date a very distant past event and they
invented BP, Before Present, which is meaningless since everyday changes the
reference and the dating of today will be ridiculous in fifty years. Some of
these dating techniques can date with a very narrow fuzzy zone like more or
less just a few years.
It is obvious their practice is
dictated by their dating technology but it is time-wise false. But it is also
politically determined. They do not want to use the BCE classic dating system,
Before the Christian Era, and they have not thought of BPE, Before Present Era,
that would erase the Christian reference, but they do not want that one either
because the Buddhists, the Muslims and some others still have their own
starting points. Don’t expect to find a solution in this book.
Even worse. Historians of
prehistoric events, that is to say more generally events that took place before
0 BCE, are dated in a very strange way as soon as the dating is a fork between
two dates. Some historians consider it illogical to speak of an event that went
from 564 to 325 BCE and they use the increasing arithmetic order which goes
against historical time and look at events before 0 BCE as if they went
backward. Once again practices are not unified in this field and you cannot
expect this book to answer such a question which is a dilemma. Personally I
consider dating has to follow any timeline that goes from left to right in many
writing system but can go from right to left in the writing system that are
thus oriented, and on a time line 10,000 BCE is closer to the starting point of
the writing porientation concerned than 5,000 BCE and the period between is 10,000-5,000
BCE. But that is not the norm. Some persist to write about a prehistoric event
that is dated 5,000-10,000 BCE.
Practicing the reading of a lot
of research literature in at times very technical fields like medicine,
pharmacy, chemistry and clinical trials for a few examples, I can tell you
norms are far from being generalized in many domains. And I will not speak of
linguistics where according to the school of reference at stake in a document you
will have to respect different layout and presentation norms which at times are
very surprising.
In the same way you must be clear
that in spite of a reference to the MLA Style sheet, many publishers and
universities or other research institutions have their own local rules. You
better check them before by reading one or two articles by these entities.
Apart from that this book is
essential for most of the questions you will encounter in your research
writing.
Dr Jacques COULARDEAU
# posted by Dr. Jacques COULARDEAU @ 2:47 AM